Guideline seeks to clarify difference between palliative sedation and euthanasia

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b426 (Published 3 February 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b426

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Tony Sheldon
  1. 1Utrecht

    The Dutch Medical Association has issued new guidance on palliative sedation, acknowledging that the practice, increasing in the Netherlands, is more “unmanageable” than it could have foreseen.

    The association accepts that its original 2005 guideline failed to properly address concerns about its possible inappropriate use. Some lay people were especially worried about the deep and continuous sedation of terminally ill patients until death.

    Fears were raised among people outside the medical profession that doctors could opt for this to avoid the legal requirements to report euthanasia (BMJ 2007;334:1075, doi:10.1136/bmj.39220.590428.DB).

    Marian Verkerk, who chairs the guidelines committee and is professor of medical ethics at Groningen University Medical Centre, accepts …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL