- Jane Feinmann, freelance journalist
- 1London
- jane{at}janefeinmann.com
The recent alert from the National Patient Safety Agency to implement the World Health Organization’s safer surgery checklist1 is just one element in a far more ambitious campaign to reduce the incidence of avoidable harm and death in the NHS. More than 80% of acute trusts—and a growing number of primary care and mental health trusts—have already signed up to the Patient Safety First campaign since its launch last July. The goal is to “change the culture of the NHS to one that makes the safety of patients the highest priority and makes all avoidable death and harm unacceptable.”
The campaign contains five interventions to reduce avoidable harm (box). But although the WHO checklist is set to become mandatory for theatre staff by February 2010, participation in the rest of the campaign is voluntary. In the place of regulation, the campaign, sponsored by National Patient Safety Agency, the Health Foundation, and the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, builds on the passion of its leaders and their experience of this transformational approach.
Campaign’s five interventions (www.patientsafetyfirst.nhs.uk)
Leadership for safety—A prerequisite for all trusts signing up to the campaign. It aims to ensure a leadership culture at Board level that promotes quality and patient safety and provides an environment where continuous improvement in harm reduction becomes routine throughout the organisation
Reducing harm from deterioration—Reducing in-hospital cardiac arrest and mortality through earlier recognition and treatment of deteriorating patients
Reducing harm in critical care—Through reliable application of central line and ventilator care procedures
Reducing harm in perioperative care—Includes prevention of surgical site infection and use of WHO’s safe surgery checklist
Reducing harm from high risk medicines—Includes anticoagulants, injectable …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012