Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Wendy Pollock, honorary fellow1,
  2. James F King, associate professor2
  1. 1School of Nursing and Social Work, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
  2. 2Perinatal Medicine, Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
  1. pollockw{at}unimelb.edu.au

    Routine collection of more detailed data is key to improving knowledge

    Maternal health is important because it sets the scene, not only for survival and subsequent health of the infant, but also for the woman herself. The traditional measurement of maternal health is the maternal mortality ratio. Gross inequalities exist in the maternal mortality ratio between developed and developing countries, and the gap is not closing. The maternal mortality ratio in developed countries is about nine in 100 000 births; in sub-Saharan Africa maternal death is over 100 times more common, and the context is different from that seen in developed countries.1

    In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b542), Knight and colleagues use the United Kingdom obstetric surveillance system (UKOSS) to assess another aspect of maternal health—severe maternal morbidity. The study shows that severe maternal morbidity is significantly more common in non-white women than in white women in the UK, particularly those in black African and Caribbean ethnic groups. It also shows that ethnicity is a marker for poor maternal outcomes, not just for an increased likelihood of maternal death.2

    Studying severe maternal …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL