Personal View

Who would want to be medicine’s sacrificial lamb?

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2414 (Published 15 June 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2414

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Julian Sheather, senior ethics adviser, BMA
  1. jsheather{at}bma.org.uk

    Audiences can be fickle things. Recently I clambered down from my ivory tower and emerged, blinking, on to a brilliantly lit podium at the Cheltenham science festival. The theme of the evening was “Playing God—risk in surgery.” I was on a panel with two surgeons, but my job was to do the ethics. I figured that the live issue would be about balancing paternalism and autonomy. Was there a limit to the amount of risk a patient could be asked to take on? Could illness and the possibility of death be coercive? Could an ambitious surgeon, keen to make a name, lead the desperate into taking impossible and mutilating risks?

    How rose tinted must be the windows of the ivory tower. I could not have been more wrong. A charming cardiac surgeon took us on a walk down memory lane, a long, long walk back to the good old, bad old days, the days before the scandals at Alder Hey and Bristol Royal Infirmary had …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL