- Daniel Beral, specialist registrar1,
- Robert Adair, clinical research fellow1,
- Adam Peckham-Cooper, foundation year 2 1,
- Damian Tolan, consultant radiologist2,
- Ian Botterill, consultant colorectal surgeon1
- 1The John Goligher Colorectal Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
- 2Department of Clinical Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary
- Correspondence to: I Botterill ian.botterill{at}leedsth.nhs.uk
- Accepted 12 September 2008
Vacuum assisted closure therapy is widely used in the management of complex wounds. Negative pressure in a closed environment promotes healing, with a reduction of wound colonisation and an acceleration of ingrowth of the granulation tissue. Vacuum therapy was originally devised for use in secondary care, but technological advancements mean it is now used in primary care too. Although the retention of surgical instruments and swabs inside body cavities after surgery is well recognised, the retention of foam dressings used in vacuum therapy has not been widely reported. Outside of the ordered theatre environment, however, dressing counts may be overlooked, and with such foam this can have serious consequences because it is radiolucent.
We report a case where foam dressings were retained in a surgical wound leading to chronic wound sepsis and further surgery.
Case report
A 67 year old overweight woman underwent a posterior pelvic clearance (anterior resection of rectum, loop ileostomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node sampling) for a left ovarian mass involving the rectosigmoid junction. Histology showed a stage IIb G1 endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinoma.
Her recovery was complicated by a superficial wound dehiscence, which was treated with vacuum therapy. Two types of foam were used: GranuFoam—standard black polyurethane foam dressing, and WhiteFoam—white polyvinyl alcohol foam with high tensile strength intended for wounds with undermined edges (Vacuum Assisted Closure, KCI, San Antonio, Texas, USA).
The dressings were changed by the hospital’s tissue viability nurses five times over a 15 …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012