- Daniel Beral, specialist registrar1,
- Robert Adair, clinical research fellow1,
- Adam Peckham-Cooper, foundation year 2 1,
- Damian Tolan, consultant radiologist2,
- Ian Botterill, consultant colorectal surgeon1
- 1The John Goligher Colorectal Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
- 2Department of Clinical Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary
- Correspondence to: I Botterill ian.botterill{at}leedsth.nhs.uk
- Accepted 12 September 2008
Vacuum assisted closure therapy is widely used in the management of complex wounds. Negative pressure in a closed environment promotes healing, with a reduction of wound colonisation and an acceleration of ingrowth of the granulation tissue. Vacuum therapy was originally devised for use in secondary care, but technological advancements mean it is now used in primary care too. Although the retention of surgical instruments and swabs inside body cavities after surgery is well recognised, the retention of foam dressings used in vacuum therapy has not been widely reported. Outside of the ordered theatre environment, however, dressing counts may be overlooked, and with such foam this can have serious consequences because it is radiolucent.
We report a case where foam dressings were retained in a surgical wound leading to chronic wound sepsis and further surgery.
Case report
A 67 year old overweight woman underwent a posterior pelvic clearance (anterior resection of rectum, loop ileostomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node sampling) for a left ovarian mass involving the rectosigmoid junction. Histology showed a stage IIb G1 endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinoma.
Her recovery was complicated by a superficial wound dehiscence, which was treated with vacuum therapy. Two types of foam were used: GranuFoam—standard black polyurethane foam dressing, and WhiteFoam—white polyvinyl alcohol foam with high tensile strength intended for wounds with undermined edges (Vacuum Assisted Closure, KCI, San Antonio, Texas, USA).
The dressings were changed by the hospital’s tissue viability nurses five times over a 15 …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27