- A Neligan, clinical research fellow1,
- D R Holdright, consultant cardiologist2,
- F J Rugg-Gunn, consultant neurologist1,
- J W Sander, professor of neurology1
- 1UCL Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG
- 2UCLH Heart Hospital, London W1G 8PF
- Correspondence to: J W Sander lsander@ion.ucl.ac.uk
- Accepted 29 August 2008
The accurate diagnosis and treatment of paroxysmal events can be difficult. It requires a detailed eye witness account and a clear description of the circumstances of the event, including location, development, tempo, and duration. Even with this information, a definitive diagnosis may not be attainable.
Case report
A 45 year old left handed man presented with a four year history of paroxysmal events. He was referred by his neurologist for consideration of epilepsy surgery. Previous medical history was unremarkable. The first episode of loss of consciousness occurred while the patient was with friends. It was preceded by a brief period of severe chest pain with profuse sweating, which lasted less than a minute. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was normal. The second episode occurred two years ago and was also preceded by chest pain. During this episode, the patient felt weak, lay on the ground, and lost consciousness. Duration was uncertain, but on regaining consciousness he was sweating profusely. He interpreted these episodes as cardiac in origin as he has a strong family history of coronary artery disease. He was seen by a cardiologist who noted a normal cardiac examination, ambulatory electrocardiogram, exercise stress test, and transthoracic echocardiogram.
He had no further episodes until about nine months before referral. The first new episode started with a sensation of a sweaty smell followed by constricting chest pain for approximately 30 minutes, after which he lost consciousness. His wife described him as being in a profound sleep with heavy snoring. He recovered about 30 minutes later, initially shouting as if waking from a bad dream, but without subsequent confusion. There …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012