- Martin J Buxton, professor of health economics
- 1Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge UB8 3PH
- martin.buxton{at}brunel.ac.uk
A national NHS programme exists in England that offers screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65, with the aim of reducing deaths from aneurysm rupture.1 The key evidence underpinning the formulation of this policy was the results of the multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS), funded by the Medical Research Council.2 More than 67 000 men aged 65-74 were recruited from four centres in the UK for this study and were randomised to either receive or not receive an invitation to screening. The results after 4 years’ follow-up showed a 42% relative risk reduction in mortality related to abdominal aortic aneurysm (absolute risk reduction from 0.33% to 0.19%). An economic evaluation indicated that the investment in screening was close to being acceptably cost effective, even in the short term.3 The evidence of clinical effectiveness was reinforced by a subsequent Cochrane Review—which estimated a 40% relative risk reduction (absolute risk reduction from 0.27% to 0.16%)—and then by results from MASS after 7 years’ follow-up.4 5 A formal long term economic model built on the MASS data indicated that abdominal aortic …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27