- Zosia Kmietowicz
- 1London
The drug giant Eli Lilly has agreed to pay $1.4bn (£1bn; €1.1bn) in settlement for the marketing of its antipsychotic drug olanzapine (Zyprexa) for off-label uses. It is the largest individual corporate fine in history.
The drug, which is licensed for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, was widely promoted by Eli Lilly between September 1999 and November 2003 to treat more common disorders, such as dementia, agitation, aggression, depression, and sleep problems, said the US Department of Justice in a statement.
The company began its promotion by encouraging doctors who treated people in nursing homes and assisted care facilities to prescribe olanzapine, because one of the drug’s side effects is sedation. It claimed that “this side effect was a therapeutic benefit, not an adverse event.” The sales force used the slogan “5 at 5,” meaning that 5 mg of olanzapine at 5 pm would …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012