- Zosia Kmietowicz
- 1London
The drug giant Eli Lilly has agreed to pay $1.4bn (£1bn; €1.1bn) in settlement for the marketing of its antipsychotic drug olanzapine (Zyprexa) for off-label uses. It is the largest individual corporate fine in history.
The drug, which is licensed for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, was widely promoted by Eli Lilly between September 1999 and November 2003 to treat more common disorders, such as dementia, agitation, aggression, depression, and sleep problems, said the US Department of Justice in a statement.
The company began its promotion by encouraging doctors who treated people in nursing homes and assisted care facilities to prescribe olanzapine, because one of the drug’s side effects is sedation. It claimed that “this side effect was a therapeutic benefit, not an adverse event.” The sales force used the slogan “5 at 5,” meaning that 5 mg of olanzapine at 5 pm would …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27