Intended for healthcare professionals

Letters The death of DNR

The undesirability of acronyms

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2016 (Published 20 May 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2016
  1. Elizabeth L Combeer, SpR, anaesthesia1
  1. 1St George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT
  1. elizabeth.combeer{at}btopenworld.com

    The statement “allow natural death” (AND) is much less clear than “do not resuscitate” (DNR).1 A term that needs defining before it may be used will always be open to interpretation and misinterpretation by patients, relatives, and staff, and have different meanings in different hospitals—a disaster in the high pressure context of a cardiac arrest.

    A better statement would be: “In the event of cessation of heartbeat and/or breathing, please do not attempt to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation. No implications regarding any other care for this patient are intended by this statement.” Although long winded, this statement cannot be misinterpreted.

    Perhaps what is revealed by Sokol’s analysis is that trying to abbreviate an extremely important clinical directive to three letters will always be fraught with problems.

    Notes

    Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2016

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    References