- Elizabeth A Watson, general practice retainer1,
- Michael J Monteiro, specialist registrar2
- 1Sunny Meed Surgery, Woking GU22 7EY
- 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX
- Correspondence to: E A Watson eliwat1{at}yahoo.co.uk
- Accepted 30 March 2009
Key points
Many babies are switched from a rear facing car seat to a forward facing seat at 9 kg (8 months of age for a boy on the 50th centile)
Excessive stretching or even transection of the spinal cord can result if a child is involved in a head-on crash while in a forward facing car seat
Rear facing seats are safer than forward facing seats for children under 4 years old
Parents and guardians should be advised to keep young children in rear facing seats for as long as possible
The clinical problem
In many countries it is a legal requirement that children under a certain height or age (1 m 35 cm or 12 years, in the United Kingdom) use child restraints appropriate for their weight while travelling in a car. This significantly reduces morbidity and mortality.1 European car seats for babies and young children are classified as group 0+ (from birth to 13 kg, and all rear facing) and group 1 (9-18 kg, often forward facing but can also be rear facing). Currently, many babies are switched from a rear facing to forward facing seat at 9 kg (age 8 months for a boy on the 50th centile.2 3 Evidence is mounting, however, that it is safer for young children to travel in a rear facing seat until 4 years of age.2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The evidence for change
The relatively large head mass and differences in the anatomy of the cervical spine in young children5 can lead to excessive stretching or even transection of the spinal cord if a child is involved in a frontal (head-on) crash while in a forward facing car seat. …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27