Letter

Nicotine replacement therapy

Authors respond to criticism that treatment is ineffective

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1979 (Published 20 May 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1979

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Paul Aveyard, senior lecturer1,
  2. David Moore, senior reviewer1,
  3. Martin Connock, systematic reviewer1,
  4. Dechao Wang, systematic reviewer1,
  5. Anne Fry-Smith, information specialist1,
  6. Pelham Barton, senior lecturer1
  1. 1School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
  1. p.n.aveyard{at}bham.ac.uk

    Siegel is surprised that we concluded that nicotine replacement therapy was effective and cannot think of other interventions that would be regarded as effective with such a high failure rate.1 He chooses a secondary outcome from our review to make his point, but as it excludes 76% of all the people who stopped smoking for a long time, this is not an accurate …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular