In the print summary of this Research paper by Cooper and colleagues (BMJ 2009;338:b974, 25 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b974) an editorial oversight led to the authors’ final amendments not being incorporated. The “Design” section should have included the size of the intervention group (n=220) and should have specified that the authors used videotaped play observations to assess the quality of mother-child interactions at 6 and 12 months and infant attachment at 18 months post partum. The “Participants and setting” section should have specified that, of a consecutive series of 452 pregnant women, three refused to participate and 449 were recruited.
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1858







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27