- Peter D Toon, head of postgraduate education
- 1Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT
- p.d.toon{at}qmul.ac.uk
- Accepted 4 July 2008
Doctors are often asked for information about their patients by third parties (employers, government agencies, insurance companies, regulatory bodies, and many others). Any doctor may receive such requests, but in the United Kingdom they come most often to general practitioners (table 1)⇓ because general practices hold the most comprehensive patient records.
- In this window
- In a new window
Medical reports in British general practice
A form may need to be filled out, or the doctor needs to write a letter. The response may be a certificate, a statement, or a report; this makes no difference and I will call them all reports. Some are straightforward, but others pose difficulties: conflicts of interest between patients and third parties, uncertainty about the information the doctor possesses and how to present it, and problems about payment. Classifying them may help us understand the problems better.
Classes of medical reports
Legal reports that advance patient care
Recommendations under the Mental Health Acts,1 reports for child protection,2 and assessments of mental capacity3 are closely linked to normal treatment and are almost part of it. Ethically they resemble referrals and requests for investigation, except that legal procedures are involved and normal rules of consent do not apply.
The public good
All doctors have duties to the public. Notification of infectious diseases 4and adverse drug reactions5 are public health functions of personal doctors,6 although they are not always carried out conscientiously.7 Death certification provides epidemiological information and also partly serves public health but, like cremation certificates and reports to coroners, death certificates also serve the public good by detecting unlawful killing, deliberately or by neglect (not always successfully, as the Shipman case showed). Court reports on criminal injuries also advance the public good, though …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27