Editorials

Imaging in patients with acute abdominal pain

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1678 (Published 26 June 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1678
  1. Adrian K Dixon, professor and honorary consultant1,
  2. Christopher J Watson, reader and honorary consultant2
  1. 1Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  1. akd15{at}radiol.cam.ac.uk

    Emerging evidence points to a new sequence of investigations

    The linked multicentre study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2431) of more than 1000 patients in the Netherlands reinforces previous research showing that imaging is worthwhile in acute abdominal pain severe enough to warrant hospital admission.1 2 In Laméris and colleagues’ study, imaging reduced clinical uncertainty and helped to eliminate a considerable number of false positive clinical diagnoses. The authors found that a strategy of using radiography followed by ultrasound worked well, with computed tomography being reserved for people with negative or inconclusive ultrasound results.1 This strategy provided the best sensitivity and the lowest radiation dose.

    The success of this approach is not surprising because it effectively follows the recommendations of several national and international guidelines. Although most guidelines try to stratify imaging according to the location of the pain,3 4 these authors found that a “blanket” protocol was adequate. But patients with renal colic, for whom computed tomography has become the investigation of choice, …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe