- Amanda I Adler, consultant physician 1,
- Elizabeth J Shaw, technical adviser2,
- Tim Stokes, associate director2,
- Francis Ruiz, technical adviser (health economics)3
- on behalf of the Guideline Development Group
- 1Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ
- 2National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Manchester M1 4BD
- 3National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London WC1V 6NA
- Correspondence to: A Adler aia31{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk
Why read this summary?
Management of type 2 diabetes is complex and aims to prevent and reduce the impact of complications by encouraging a healthy lifestyle, controlling blood pressure and blood lipids, and lowering blood glucose concentrations. In recent years new drugs have become available for blood glucose control, including the long acting insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin glargine); glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetics (exenatide); and dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (sitagliptin and vildagliptin). In addition, safety concerns have surfaced recently about the use of the thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone).
This article summarises the most recent recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the use of newer agents for control of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes1 and updates the relevant section of the NICE clinical guideline on the management of type 2 diabetes.2
Recommendations
NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Development Group’s experience and opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets.
DPP-4 inhibitors and thiazolidinediones
DPP-4 inhibitors stabilise concentrations of endogenous glucagon-like peptide and increase insulin secretion.
Consider adding a DPP-4 inhibitor or a thiazolidinedione as second line treatment with metformin instead of a sulphonylurea when blood glucose control remains or becomes inadequate (haemoglobin A1c ≥6.5% or a higher level agreed with the individual) if:
-The person is at serious risk of hypoglycaemia and its consequences, or
-A sulphonylurea is not tolerated or is contraindicated—for example, because of severe renal impairment.
[Based on evidence ranging from low to moderate quality from randomised controlled trials; a meta-analysis; current NICE guidance2; and a health economic analysis]
Consider adding a DPP-4 inhibitor or a thiazolidinedione as second line treatment to sulphonylurea alone when blood …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27