- Alan Maynard, professor of health economics, Department of Health Sciences, University of York
- akm3{at}york.ac.uk
At worst the doctor should do the patient no harm. At best they should practice EBM—in this case, economics based medicine—by focusing on the comparative cost effectiveness of competing interventions.1 EBM requires doctors to recognise the universal issue of opportunity cost, where a decision to treat one patient involves the denial of treatment to another patient. It also obliges the doctor to focus on value: the value of what they give up when they treat a patient (cost) and the value of what is gained as a result of treatment—hopefully improved length and quality of life for the patient. Clinical practice should …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012