- Brian McKinstry, reader in primary care research 1,
- Paul Padfield, professor of hypertension2
- 1Centre for Population Health Sciences, General Practice Section, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9DR
- 2 Department of Medical Sciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH42XU
- Correspondence to: B McKinstry brian.mckinstry{at}ed.ac.uk
A 29 year old white man presented to general practice after a routine check at work, which was carried out because he felt lightheaded. His work found a blood pressure of 178/104 mm Hg and a pulse rate of 100 beats/min. His cousin, who was a nurse, rechecked his blood pressure and found it to be 138/92 mm Hg. He was not a regular attendee at the surgery and was taking no drugs. He had occasionally felt lightheaded during the past year, but he had never fainted. He had a family history of high blood pressure. He was slim (body mass index of 20), and in the surgery he had a blood pressure of 172/94 mm Hg and a pulse rate of 98 beats/min. Optic fundi, peripheral pulses, heart sounds, and chest examination were all normal. He had no abdominal bruits.
Questions
1 What is the most likely diagnosis?
2 What other conditions might you suspect?
3 How would you assess him further?
4 How would you manage and follow up this patient?
Answers
Short answers
1 Primary “essential” hypertension or “white coat hypertension” (high in surgery but normal at home).
2 Secondary hypertension caused by drug misuse, phaeochromocytoma, primary aldosteronism, renal failure, renal artery stenosis, or coarctation of the aorta.
3 Take a history to exclude drug and alcohol misuse as causes. Ask him about symptoms of palpitations or sweating. Measure urea, electrolytes, lipids, and random blood glucose. Carry out a full blood count, liver function tests, urinalysis, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and resting …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012