- Karen McColl, freelance writer
- 1Savoie, France
- karen{at}karenmccoll.co.uk
Increasingly, people who are desperate to change their behaviour are putting their money on the line to motivate them towards success. But can placing a public bet really help people to lose weight, quit smoking, or exercise more? Could this type of commitment contract be a valuable tool for promoting public health?
Over 20 000 people have publicly signed up to change their behaviour at the online commitment store StickK (pronounced stick—the silent second letter k refers to the legal shorthand for contract) since the website launched in January 2008. Of these, about a third have placed a financial stake—promising to hand over a total of $1.28m (£870 000; €960 000) if they fail to meet their goals.
It may seem surprising that people chose to put their money at risk in this way, especially since many would already have tried to change their behaviour and failed. But Yale economics professor and StickK cofounder, Dean Karlan, thinks the explanation is clear. “Most people have something in their life that they would like to change. That’s why we make New Year resolutions—yet most people can think back to their previous resolutions and realise that they didn’t succeed. So it makes sense that offering someone a new way to meet their goal should generate very high take-up rates,” he explains.
The self made contracts at www.stickK.com and similar websites such as www.fatbet.net and www.makemoneylosingweight.com are examples of commitment contracts. The idea behind a commitment contract is that people choose a goal for changing an aspect of their behaviour, make a public commitment to change, and in some cases put up a financial stake that they are …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012