People on haemodialysis get no cardiovascular benefit from statins
People on maintenance haemodialysis have a high risk of cardiovascular events and the search is on for a safe way to protect them from this lethal companion to end stage renal disease⇑. Statins now join the long list of interventions that have fallen by the wayside, after rosuvastatin failed to protect patients from heart attacks, strokes, or death from cardiovascular disease in a placebo controlled trial (hazard ratio for rosuvastatin v placebo 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.11). All participants were over 50. About a quarter had diabetes, and about 40% had pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Rosuvastatin worked no better than a placebo for anyone, although it reduced serum concentrations of low density lipoprotein cholesterol by a mean of 43% from a baseline of 2.6 mmol/l.
The trial was large (n=2776) and just powerful enough to exclude a clinically meaningful effect, says an editorial (p 1455). The most likely explanation for the disappointing results is that statins simply don’t work in these patients—probably because their heart disease has an unusual aetiology that doesn’t respond to cholesterol lowering treatments. People on maintenance haemodialysis tend to have left ventricular hypertrophy and aortic calcification, rather than the atheromatous heart disease encountered in the general population.
US medical associations must cut ties with industry or lose public trust
Many opinion leaders in the US believe that the complex web of interactions between the drugs industry and professional medical associations is undermining scientific integrity, safe health care, and public trust in the profession. A purge is long overdue, and one group of authors recently set out in the clearest possible terms how associations should go about doing this. Their recommendations include working towards a ban on all industry funding, except for revenue from journal advertising and exhibition stands at meetings (which must be placed out of the way, so delegates are not forced to walk past …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012