- Geoff Watts, freelance journalist
- 1London
- geoff{at}scileg.freeserve.co.uk
A scanning technology still in its infancy may eventually offer a more complete understanding of brain disorders from autism to schizophrenia. If it does, at least part of the credit should go not only to the researchers now developing it but to some of the great neuroanatomists of the 19th century.
The history of science is an endless saga of competing ideas in which new insights emerge, develop, and flourish—or, as often as not, get replaced by something better. It is unusual for an idea to fade and then, decades later, be resurrected. But this is more or less what’s happened to the ideas of Meynert, Wernicke, and other European anatomists of their era. The obstacle to earlier development was that it took another century to invent the scanning technology required to test them.
Among the handful of today’s researchers eager to deploy this new technology is Marco Catani of the Centre for Neuroimaging at London’s Institute of Psychiatry. Looking back at the work of his predecessors, he finds himself impressed. Through dissection and observation of postmortem material they came up with the idea that many of the functions of the brain are localised. More than that, they began to fashion a crude wiring diagram. “It was a revolutionary idea,” Dr Catani says, “to go from anatomy to function.”
Early links
Some of the earliest detail came from Theodore Meynert, a Viennese professor of psychiatry who died in 1892. Although simple brain functions may be localised in one part of the cortex, higher functions, he insisted, are the product of interactions between different areas of the brain: interactions that require connecting pathways of …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012