- Richard M Cubbon, lecturer in cardiology1,
- Klaus K A Witte, senior lecturer in cardiology and honorary consultant cardiologist1
- 1Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
- Correspondence to: K K A Witte klauswitte{at}hotmail.com
Summary points
Consider cardiac resynchronisation therapy for any patient with chronic heart failure if they have, or have recently had, moderate or severe symptoms of heart failure; if their left ventricular ejection fraction is ≤35%; and if their QRS duration is ≥150 ms or 120-149 ms with dyssynchrony measured on echocardiography
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy can improve symptoms and prognosis
Advanced age does not reduce the effectiveness of the therapy
All healthcare professionals involved in the management of heart failure need to be aware of the potential benefits of cardiac resynchronisation therapy and who to refer
Evaluation of the QRS duration and heart rhythm on the electrocardiogram should be part of the standard management of any patient with heart failure and repeated at least yearly
Chronic heart failure is common, affecting about 900 000 people in the United Kingdom and with a prevalence of about 6-10% in people aged over 65 years1; despite modern drug treatment, it carries a high morbidity and a 10% annual mortality. About a third of patients with chronic heart failure have a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%,2 up to 40% of whom are at risk of worse outcomes and more severe heart failure identified by conduction delay (QRS duration on a surface electrocardiogram of >120 ms).3
A recent addition to therapeutic algorithms for chronic heart failure is cardiac resynchronisation therapy (also known as biventricular pacing). Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is a well proved treatment for patients with heart failure who have left ventricular systolic dysfunction and conduction delay, and it can reduce symptoms and admission to hospital and improve quality of life and prognosis. Clear mortality benefits have moved it from a treatment for intractable symptoms to one that, alongside β blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists, is now a routine therapy for patients …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27