- Sophie D West, consultant1,
- Helen A McBeath, general practitioner2,
- John R Stradling, professor1
- 1Sleep Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ
- 2St Clements Surgery, Oxford OX4 1JS
- Correspondence to: S D West sophie{at}west66.freeserve.co.uk
Case scenario
A 50 year old long distance lorry driver attends for a review of his heavy goods vehicle licence. His body mass index is 30, and he says his wife complains that he snores loudly. The history of loud snoring in this overweight man should raise concern about possible obstructive sleep apnoea. As he is a lorry driver this diagnosis is particularly important.
Obstructive sleep apnoea is characterised by snoring, recurrent episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep (apnoeas and hypopnoeas), and arousals. The resulting sleep disturbance can cause excessive and disabling daytime sleepiness. The term obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome is used for people who have features of obstructive sleep apnoea on a sleep study and also have resulting daytime sleepiness.
How common is it?
Prevalence varies according to the population studied
In the US state of Wisconsin a cohort study of 30-60 year old workers found that 24% of men and 9% of women had evidence of obstructive sleep apnoea (at least five apnoea or hypopnoea events per hour).1 This study estimated that only 4% of men and 2% of women reported any daytime sleepiness also (that is, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome)
In a UK study, with lower levels of obesity, the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in men was about 1%2
These studies show that obstructive sleep apnoea is a common problem, which is likely to increase further as obesity levels rise
Selected populations show a higher prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea—for example, 23% of men with type 2 diabetes were estimated to have appreciable obstructive sleep apnoea.3 Estimates suggest that 59 400 people receive continuous positive airway pressure treatment in England (0.2% of the population); but the National Institute for …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012