- Susannah Long, clinical research fellow and specialist registrar in geriatric and general medicine,
- Graham Neale, visiting professor,
- Charles Vincent, professor of clinical safety research
- 1Clinical Safety Research Unit, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London W2 1NY
- Correspondence to: S Long, s.long{at}imperial.ac.uk
Learning points
Adverse events are common, particularly in vulnerable patients such as older people
Junior doctors are at the front line of patient care and therefore play a crucial role in reducing harm to patients
If a junior doctor is at all worried about a patient, it is their responsibility to seek help
Junior doctors should discuss and report adverse events, with the aim of learning from them
It is vital that a full apology and explanation be given to the patient when an adverse event occurs
Many junior doctors may not be aware that about one in 10 acute hospital admissions in the United Kingdom is associated with at least one adverse event, occasions on which patients are harmed by their medical management rather than the illness itself.1 2 About half of these adverse events are thought to be preventable, and a third are associated with serious disability or death. More commonly, less serious incidents cause inconvenience and discomfort for the patient and can lead to a longer stay in hospital—see the first scenario box about Mrs Jones (case scenario: part1). Junior doctors are at the front line of patient care and therefore play a crucial role in reducing harm to patients. This is why patient safety is an integral part of the Foundation Curriculum (www.foundationprogramme.nhs.uk).
Why do things go wrong?
Studies of errors in health care and other industries have led to a much broader understanding of their cause, with less focus on the individual who makes the error and more on the wider system and organisational factors.3 An action or omission may be easily identified as the immediate cause of an incident, but closer analysis usually reveals a series …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27