- Nigel Hawkes, freelance journalist
- 1London
- nigel.hawkes1{at}btinternet.com
When the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) first started to flex its muscles in 1999, the drug industry would love to have exported it, preferably somewhere like Mars. Ten years later, the influence of NICE, far from being blunted, is beginning to spread. Its methods and organisational model have become something of a beacon to governments wrestling with the issues of efficacy and fairness in healthcare delivery.
This newfound popularity has inspired NICE to set up a small team to investigate whether NICE-ness can be sold for a profit abroad. Andrew Dillon, NICE’s chief executive, said that interest has come from many different places. “It’s clear that what we do and how we do it is of interest to healthcare systems around the world, regardless of how they are funded,” he said. “It’s not related to the wealth of the system. Optimising the way money is spent is our approach, and that is of interest to everybody, rich or poor.”
Widened influence
Among rich countries, the United States might be reckoned about as likely as Mars to provide a haven for NICE. But the appointment of former senator Tom Daschle as President Obama’s health secretary has changed the picture.
Mr Daschle’s big idea, outlined last year in his book Critical: What We Can Do About the Health Crisis, is the creation of a federal health board to provide guidelines and maybe also to measure the cost effectiveness of treatments. “We’re paying top dollar for mediocre results,” the book claims. By choosing what treatments should be provided and how much they were worth, the new board “would steer providers to the services …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012