- J C Miller, medical writer,
- M A Blake, radiologist,
- G W L Boland, radiologist
- 1Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence to: G W L Boland gboland{at}partners.org
- Accepted 1 May 2008
Learning points
Incidental adrenal lesions are often detected by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
The diagnosis is highly dependent on whether the individual has a known history of cancer, with most lesions proving benign in patients without known cancer
Characterisation of the adrenal lesion is essential in patients with a history of malignancy so that the disease can be staged and treatment decided
Most lesions can be characterised using adrenal protocol CT, although a few indeterminate lesions may require MRI, nuclear imaging, and/or percutaneous biopsy
Functional adenomas and pheochromocytomas are best detected by laboratory tests
The patient
A woman in her 60s presented with a three week history of a productive cough and haemoptysis. A chest x ray film showed a 2.9 cm right upper lobe lung mass. Bronchoscopy and biopsy found non-small cell lung cancer. Staging, contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest confirmed the upper lobe lung mass but showed no evidence of metastatic disease in the chest or liver. However, a 2.3 cm smooth walled, left adrenal mass was identified (fig 1⇓). No prior CT examinations were available for comparison; growth of an adrenal mass is highly suggestive of a malignancy, whereas benign lesions are stable or grow very slowly.1 Biochemical analysis was negative for pheochromocytoma and adrenocortical functioning tumour.
Fig 1 Contrast enhanced staging computed tomogram in a 65 year old woman with a recent diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer showing a 2.3 cm smooth walled left adrenal mass (arrow)
Adrenal masses are common findings whose prevalence increases with age.1 2 3 4 5 In patients without any known cancer, almost all of these masses …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012