Editorials

Minimising pain during intravenous cannulation

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2993 (Published 10 February 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a2993
  1. Andrew Moore, senior research fellow,
  2. Sebastian Straube, academic foundation year 2 doctor,
  3. Henry McQuay, Nuffield professor of clinical anaesthetics
  1. 1Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
  1. andrew.moore{at}nda.ox.ac.uk

    Several options exist, but none has a strong evidence base

    Cannulation causes moderate or severe pain in a substantial number of children and adults. Some institutions have procedures for minimising the predictable pain of cannulation, especially in children. However, a survey from the United States reported that emergency departments rarely use drugs to reduce pain during insertion of intravenous catheters in children.1 In less predictable situations, such as emergency departments, non-pharmacological alternatives, like distraction, may be more appropriate. A recent review of pharmacological interventions to reduce the pain of cannulation in children highlights the increasing number of options, and the complexity of deciding which one to choose in a particular situation.2

    In the linked randomised controlled trial (doi:10.1136/bmj.b215), Hijazi and colleagues assess the effect of vapocoolant spray during intravenous cannulation in 201 adults in an emergency department.3 Vapocoolant spray significantly reduced moderate or severe cannulation pain compared …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe