Androgen deprivation therapy may not work for men with early prostate cancer
Men with early prostate cancer can already choose between surgery, radiotherapy, or a simple wait and see policy as their primary treatment. Androgen deprivation therapy is another increasingly popular option, although there is precious little evidence that it works, say researchers from the US.
An analysis including more than 19 000 men with localised prostate cancer found no association between this treatment and a longer life or a reduced risk of death from prostate cancer. Men treated conservatively did just as well as—and on some measures they did slightly better than—men who had androgen deprivation therapy (orchidectomy or a luteinising hormone releasing hormone) as their primary treatment. For example, treatment was associated with a higher risk of death from prostate cancer over 10 years (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33). This result persisted through extensive adjustment of baseline differences between those who did and did not choose androgen deprivation therapy as their initial treatment.
Androgen deprivation therapy is far from harmless, say the researchers. It has been associated with gynaecomastia, impotence, hot flushes, fractures, diabetes, and heart attacks. It is also expensive. This observational study isn’t the final word, but it is probably big enough and convincing enough to justify caution with this treatment. All the men in the cohort were over 65 and diagnosed between 1992 and 2002.
Respiratory support improves symptoms not survival in patients with acute pulmonary oedema
Men and women with acute pulmonary oedema caused by heart failure got better slightly faster when treated with non-invasive ventilation in a large trial. But early improvements in breathlessness and metabolic state did not translate in to a lower risk of death during the first week.
After promising but inconsistent results from meta-analyses of small trials, researchers from the UK recruited more than 1000 patients into a three armed trial comparing two methods of non-invasive ventilation with supplementary oxygen alone. …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27