- Vikas Chadha, specialist registrar in ophthalmology1,
- Iain Cruickshank, general practitioner2,
- Robert Swingler, consultant in neurology3,
- Roshini Sanders, consultant in ophthalmology1
- 1Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline KY12 0SU
- 2Leven Health Centre, Leven KY8 4ET
- 3Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY
- Correspondence to: V Chadha vchdh{at}aol.com
- Accepted 1 April 2008
Ocular side effects of steroid eye drops include cataract, glaucoma, and corneal infections.1 2 3 These side effects are well known to general practitioners and ophthalmologists, who are the main prescribers of steroid eye drops.4 5 Oral steroids, however, are prescribed by a wide range of doctors in primary and secondary care.6 The potential complication of systemic, steroid induced glaucoma is less well known. This leads to irrevocable visual loss. The patient may be asymptomatic until central vision is affected.7 We report such a case.
Case report
A 63 year old man attended his usual optometrist in April 2005 complaining of gradual difficulty in focusing with his right eye over two months. The optometrist found raised intraocular pressures, cupping of the optic disc, and visual field loss and referred him urgently to hospital. At the hospital consultation his Snellen’s visual acuity was 6/12 right with an afferent pupillary defect and 6/6 left. Colour vision testing was not performed. Intraocular pressures (normal range 10-21 mm Hg) were 31 mm Hg right and 26 mm Hg left with wide open anterior chamber angles. Anterior segments were otherwise normal with no evidence of cataract. Ophthalmoscopy showed advanced glaucomatous cupping of the optic disc, with a cup to disc ratio (normal <0.5) of 0.9 right and 0.8 left (fig 1⇓). Computerised visual fields confirmed advanced glaucomatous field loss in the right eye and moderate loss in the left eye (fig 2⇓).
Fig 1 Advanced glaucomatous cupping of the optic discs with a cup to disc ratio (normal <0.5) of 0.9 in the right eye (top image) and 0.8 in the left eye (bottom image). The arrows indicate …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012