Preventing thromboembolism after joint surgery just got easier
Rivaroxaban is a new anticoagulant that inhibits activated factor X or thrombin⇑. It acts fast, produces predictable anticoagulation, and can be taken by mouth just once a day. Could rivaroxaban be used to give extended protection from venous thromboembolism after joint replacement surgery? A series of three trials suggests it works better than enoxaparin, an injectable low molecular weight heparin, as both short term and extended prophylaxis.
The first head to head trial compared five weeks of rivaroxaban 10 mg with five weeks of enoxaparin 40 mg in adults having hip replacement surgery. The new pill reduced the risk of deep vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause by 70% (1.1% v 3.7%; relative risk reduction 70%, 95% CI, 49% to 82%). In a second trial using the same outcome, a shorter course of rivaroxaban (10-14 days) worked significantly better than a shorter course of enoxaparin in adults having knee replacement surgery (relative risk reduction, 49%, 35% to 61%). The third trial compared long term rivaroxaban (31-39 days) with shorter term enoxaparin (10-14 days) in adults having hip replacement surgery. Only 2% of patients given the new drug for a longer period either died or had a deep vein thrombosis or non-fatal pulmonary embolism, compared with just over 9% of controls (relative risk reduction 79%, P<0.001).
In all three trials, rivaroxaban also reduced the risk of major thromboembolism, defined as proximal deep vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or death related to venous thromboembolism. None reported excess bleeding associated with the new drug. Industry sponsors Bayer HealthCare and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals analysed the data.
Current guidelines already recommend extended prophylaxis after joint replacement surgery, but it has been hard to achieve with heparins, which must be injected, or warfarin, which must be monitored. Rivaroxaban and …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012