- Colin Farrelly, associate professor
- 1Department of Political Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada N2L 3G1
- farrelly{at}uwaterloo.ca
- Accepted 27 March 2008
Has the time come to get more serious about the effort to slow human ageing? The advocates of the longevity dividend believe it has.1 On 12 September 2006 the not-for-profit citizen advocacy organisation Alliance for Aging Research held a Capitol Hill symposium entitled “Going for the longevity dividend: scientific goals for the world’s aging populations.” This campaign calls on Congress to invest $3bn (£1.5bn; €2bn) annually into understanding the biology of ageing. That would amount to about 1% of the current Medicare budget.
In an era where media headlines are dominated by the war on terror and global warming, and much of the world’s population live in conditions of poverty and disease, it might seem insensitive and unfair to suggest that we should divert more scarce public funding into tackling ageing. But such a knee jerk reaction can be overcome once you consider the science and ethics behind the proposal.
Science of ageing
So is there any reason to believe that real, tangible benefits could be reaped through slowing down ageing? The scientists working in these areas certainly believe there is. Just two or three decades ago, research on ageing was a backwater.2 But cellular, molecular, and genetic studies using in vitro models and short lived invertebrates have resulted in an impressive pace of discovery.3 Success in increasing longevity in laboratory organisms has shown that ageing is not an immutable process.
For example, many studies have found that the lifespan of organisms such as worms, flies, and mice can be extended by restricting food intake. Dietary restriction delays and slows the progression of various diseases associated with age, including neoplasia, and maintains many physiological processes in a youthful …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27