- Robert N Butler, president 1,
- Richard A Miller, professor 2,
- Daniel Perry, executive director3,
- Bruce A Carnes, professor4,
- T Franklin Williams, professor emeritus5,
- Christine Cassel, president6,
- Jacob Brody, professor7,
- Marie A Bernard, professor4,
- Linda Partridge, director 8,
- Thomas Kirkwood, director9,
- George M Martin, scientific director10,
- S Jay Olshansky, professor 7
- 1 International Longevity Center, New York, USA
- 2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- 3Alliance for Aging Research, Washington, DC, USA
- 4University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- 5University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
- 6American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 7University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
- 8Institute of Healthy Ageing, University College London, London
- 9Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle
- 10American Federation for Aging Research, Seattle, WA, USA
- Correspondence to: S J Olshansky sjayo{at}uic.edu
Our susceptibility to disease increases as we grow older. Robert Butler and colleagues argue that interventions to slow down ageing could therefore have much greater benefit than those targeted at individual disease
Many countries now have ageing populations and are facing an increased prevalence of age related diseases and escalating healthcare costs. However, if ageing is combined with extended years of healthy life, it could also produce unprecedented social, economic, and health dividends. In recent decades, scientists have shown that the underlying biological processes of ageing, which give rise to most diseases and other age related health problems, can be delayed. We argue that a concerted effort to slow ageing would provide a broad strategy for primary prevention that would greatly enhance and accelerate improvements in health at all ages.
Rise of human longevity
Life expectancy at birth rose by a remarkable 30 years in developed countries during the 20th century, initially because of reductions in infant, child, and maternal mortality and then because of declining mortality in middle and old age.1 2 In 1900, about 40% of babies born in countries for which reliable data existed were expected to live beyond age 65.3 Today in these same countries more than 88% of all newborns will live past age 65 and at least 44% will live beyond age 85. This dramatic extension of life has provided social and economic benefits.
The traditional medical approach to ameliorating modern chronic diseases has been to tackle them …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012