- Edgar Jones, professor1,
- Kamaldeep Bhui, professor of cultural psychiatry and epidemiology2
- 1Institute of Psychiatry and King’s Centre for Military Health Research, London
- 2Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London
- Correspondence to: E Jones edgar.jones{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
The recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai have increased pressure on authorities not only to discover ways to prevent such attacks but also to undermine the appeal of radical groups set on violence. However, in May 2008 a postgraduate student studying Islamic terrorism at Nottingham University was arrested for possessing a copy of the “al-Qaeda handbook.”1 Although the student was released without charge after six days, Colin Campbell, the university’s vice chancellor, warned researchers that if they accessed terrorist material they “run the risk of being investigated and prosecuted on terrorism charges.” This incident marks a change of attitude towards those who undertake research into the psychology behind criminal acts of violence and terrorism. Academics should be mindful of infringing antiterrorism laws and may need to protect themselves when applying for ethical permission by setting out a process to balance research activity, confidentiality, and public safety.
The introduction of wide ranging legislation designed to identify and detain terrorist suspects raises new ethical questions. In the past no medical school academic studying murder or paedophilia would have …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27