This article has a correction
Please see: US psychiatrist is fired from radio programme for not disclosing drug company ties
- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- 1New York
Frederick Goodwin, an eminent US psychiatrist, has been fired as host of a popular radio programme after Senator Charles Grassley revealed that the doctor had received $1.2m (£0.8m; €0.9m) in speaking fees and $100 000 in expenses from GlaxoSmithKline since 2000 (Congressional Record, 19 Nov, pp S10641-4, “Payments to Radio Host”)
The award winning programme, The Infinite Mind, was carried on two satellite channels of National Public Radio (NPR). It was produced by an independent company, Lichtenstein Creative Media, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Dr Goodwin began hosting the programme in 1998.
NPR issued a statement saying that all programmes on the satellite channels were “expected to adhere to the same code of ethics and practices that apply to programs produced and distributed by NPR. It appears that The Infinite Mind was in direct violation of that code, and is being removed from the channel.”
Bill Lichtenstein, head of the media company, denied that his company knew Dr Goodwin had ties to industry that put its programme in breach of NPR’s code. He said, “We were aware that Dr Goodwin had previously had involvement in the areas of education and research with pharmaceutical companies. However, what we were not aware of, at any time, until we received the call from Gardiner Harris at the New York Times on 20 November 2008, was that he had business and marketing relationships with pharmaceutical companies, even though he was required under his strict conflict of interest agreement that he signed to disclose those relationships to us.”
Senator Grassley, an Iowa Republican, has been investigating financial links between doctors and drug companies for some time (BMJ 2008;337:a2363, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2363; 2008;337:a2315, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2315; 2008;337:a2088, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2088; 2008;337:a930, doi:10.1136/bmj.a930; 2008;337:a929, doi:10.1136/bmj.a929; …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012