- Joe Collier, emeritus professor of medicines policy
- 1St George’s Medical School, London SW17 0RE
- jcollier{at}sgul.ac.uk
On 11 December 2008 the Department of Health and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry jointly published details of an agreement they had reached after nine months’ negotiation for the pricing of brand name drugs sold to the NHS.1 The new terms, which came into effect on 1 January 2009 and will run for five years, are the latest in a continually evolving Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme.
Under the framework of this scheme, which was originally known as the Voluntary Price Regulation Scheme, government and industry have been negotiating “voluntary and non-contractual” terms for drug pricing since 1956, and the previous set of terms—which started in 2005—was due to run until 2010. However, in 2007 a market report from the Office of Fair Trading argued that the scheme was outdated, perverse, and not fit for purpose, and demanded that it be reformed.2 The government unilaterally withdrew from the 2005-10 scheme in February 2008 despite resistance from the drug industry.3 To what extent does the current scheme allay the Office of Fair Trading’s criticisms?
Much has been reformed …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 9 February 2012
Why not use ultrasound for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer for both the exclusion criteria for recruitment and for diagnosis as outcome variable
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Can the severity of menopausal symptoms be predicted?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Does the BMJ have a particular ideology to pursue in assisted dying?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 9 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012