- P J Cormie, general practitioner1,
- M Nairn, programme manager2,
- J Welsh, professor of palliative medicine34
- on behalf of the Guideline Development Group
- 1Stow Health Centre, Stow, Galashiels TD1 2SQ
- 2Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Edinburgh EH7 5EA
- 3Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine University of Glasgow, Glasgow
- 4Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow G12 0YN
- Correspondence to: M Nairn moray.nairn{at}nhs.net
Why read this summary?
About a third of patients with cancer report pain, rising to three quarters in the advanced stages of the disease.1 Cancer pain has many dimensions including psychological, physical, social, and spiritual, which must be addressed in order to improve quality of life and functional ability. Surveys show that the effectiveness of pain control in patients with cancer varies, with 12% to 51% of patients reporting unsatisfactory pain control.2 3 This article summarises the most recent recommendations from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) on the control of pain in adults with cancer.4
Recommendations
SIGN recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence. The strength of the evidence is graded as A, B, C, or D (fig 1⇓), but the grading does not reflect the clinical importance of the recommendations. Recommended best practice (“good practice points”) based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group is also indicated (as GPP).
Fig 1 Explanation of SIGN grades of recommendations
Factors affecting patients
Good communication between health professionals, patients, and carers is important for accurately assessing pain and improving compliance with treatment (GPP).
Cancer can destabilise patients’ lives in terms of their self identity, belief systems, and place in the world. Health professionals should have skills to help patients deal with this spiritual pain (GPP).
Psychosocial factors
Psychological factors can profoundly influence the perception of pain and how the patient responds behaviourally and emotionally. The meaning of pain for patients with cancer may differ from that for patients with non-life threatening illness. Some patients with cancer may see increased pain as a sign of disease progression or the failure of strong medication, and this may affect mood and adherence to treatment protocols.
In a comprehensive chronic pain assessment, include routine screening for psychological distress using a validated tool such as the brief …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27