- Douglas Kamerow, chief scientist, RTI International, and associate editor, BMJ
- dkamerow{at}rti.org
With the US economy in shambles, it is hard for the presidential candidates to talk about anything else. The small amount of newsprint and bandwidth available for other issues is devoted to Iraq, Afghanistan, and terrorism. Nobody is focusing much on health care and science policy any more. And when health care is discussed, it is mainly about coverage and cost: how can we change our healthcare “system” to take care of more of our population and afford to pay for it? Pundits proclaim that healthcare reform will be unachievable in the next president’s first term because there is no money to do it and no energy for anything but the economy and the war. This is depressing.
One thing that doesn’t depend on funding, however, and that could be done immediately by the next president would be to reverse the unprecedented policies of George W Bush’s administration that have subverted scientific integrity throughout the government.
The Union of Concerned Scientists has documented dozens of examples over the past eight years of direct …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27