- Maie Walsh, medical student1,
- Geoffrey Spurling, senior lecturer2
- 1University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia
- 2Discipline of General Practice, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hospital
- Correspondence to: G Spurling g.spurling{at}uq.edu.au
- Accepted 24 April 2008
While I (MW) was observing general practitioner consultations as a medical student, a 46 year old woman with type 2 diabetes presented for prescriptions. Because this is a common presentation, I thought this was one consultation that I should tune into. The patient’s diabetes was well controlled by diet and lifestyle alone. Her most recent glycated haemoglobin value was 6.1%. Hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein cholesterol 4.2) and hypertension (blood pressure 125/80 mm Hg) were effectively managed with drugs. She was a regular smoker, which gave her an absolute cardiovascular risk of 5-10% (New Zealand cardiovascular risk calculator; www.nzgg.org.nz/guidelines/0035/CVD_Risk_Chart.pdf) over five years. However, one of the drugs she was taking didn’t make sense to me, so I asked my supervisor why someone with well controlled diabetes who was otherwise healthy should be on aspirin. “It’s routine to give someone with type 2 diabetes aspirin,” he assured me. I must have looked unconvinced because his initial confidence faltered and gave way to a slightly uncertain frown. We wondered, “What is the evidence base behind routinely prescribing aspirin in type 2 diabetes?”
Searching for the evidence
I decided to use this question as a subject for an upcoming evidence based medicine assignment, a component of my assessment for the general practitioner rotation. I began by consulting the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines because these are used by doctors throughout Australia as a benchmark for clinical practice. The current guidelines stated that unless contraindicated, low dose prophylactic aspirin (75-350 mg) is recommended to prevent potential macrovascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes.1 A few weeks later, the general practice had an evidence based medicine journal club where my question was developed …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27