- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- 1New York
Leading US medical, religious, political, and reproductive health groups have sent letters to the federal Department of Health and Human Services objecting to a proposed rule regarding conscientious objection. The rule, issued in August, would protect healthcare workers from discrimination if they refused to participate in medical care to which they had religious or moral objections (BMJ 2008;337:a1509, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1509).
The rule focused on abortion, which it did not define. However, the rule would also protect healthcare workers who objected to any type of care. They would not be required to counsel or refer patients to health providers who offered such care.
Healthcare providers …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27