Consent for publication

Editors and authors vexed and confused by consent

BMJ 2008; 337 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1879 (Published 1 October 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1879

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Harvey Marcovitch, chairman, Committee on Publication Ethics1
  1. 1Banbury OX15 6JW
  1. h.marcovitch{at}btinternet.com

    Smith points out the potential legal pitfalls when submitting papers that might breach patient confidentiality.1 This is an issue often discussed at the regular quarterly meetings of editor members of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Examples include the frustration of an author unable to obtain publication of his discovery of a new technique for confirming …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL