- Andrew Connor, registrar in renal medicine1,
- Lucy Sykes, senior house officer in renal medicine1,
- Ian S D Roberts, consultant histopathologist2,
- Charles E Weston, consultant nephrologist1
- 1Department of Renal Medicine, Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester DT1 2JY
- 2Department of Cellular Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
- Correspondence to: A Connor, 3 Hope Terrace, Martinstown, Dorset DT2 9JN andrewconnor1974{at}hotmail.co.uk
- Accepted 25 March 2008
Oral sodium phosphate preparations are used as bowel purgatives before colonoscopy. Subsequent renal impairment is increasingly being reported.1 We describe a case of acute phosphate nephropathy with persistent renal impairment after administration of sodium phosphate.
Case report
A 76 year old woman was admitted with rectal bleeding. Her past medical history included hypertension—treated with nifedipine—and long standing use of tobacco. Physical examination was unremarkable.
Laboratory results were normal—haemoglobin 106 g/l, white cell count 7.2×109/l, platelets 357×109/l, sodium 132 mmol/l, potassium 4.3 mmol/l, urea 6.2 mmol/l, and creatinine 98 µmol/l.
She underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy after being given a sodium phosphate enema (Fleet Ready-to-use; De Witt) the night before (day 1). Colonoscopy was performed on day 4 after she took two sachets of oral sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phospho-soda; De Witt). Histological findings were consistent with chronic active ulcerative colitis. She was discharged and prescribed mesalazine.
On day 6 she presented with acute renal failure (creatinine 541 µmol/l). She received intravenous fluids and mesalazine was replaced by prednisolone enemas. A renal consultation was obtained.
Urinalysis was unremarkable. She was normocalcaemic (2.4 mmol/l) but mildly hyperphosphataemic (1.54 mmol/l). Results of a screen for glomerulonephritis and renal tract ultrasonography were normal. Interstitial nephritis secondary to mesalazine was considered and she underwent renal biopsy.
Twenty seven glomeruli were …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012