Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
The article by Descatha and Baer rightly points out the evidence of
providing defibrillators within the workplace and elsewhere, along with
the need for a training programme. The story below emphasizes that this
need is just as great as having the AED in the first place.
I recently found myself in the situation where a cardiac arrest
occurred in front of my eyes in a shopping centre of around 310 stores.
With all the recent literature on the benefit of defibrillators in such a
place I expected there to be one to hand. Sudden cardiac arrest is a
leading cause of death in Europe affecting over 700,000 people each year.1
The chance of successful defibrillation declines at a rate of 7-10% with
each minute of delay.
I was told there was not a single AED in the centre, and
unfortunately despite vigorous basic life support the person died before
the ambulance crew could get him to a defibrillator. After this event I
investigated to find there were in fact 3 defibrillators within the
centre. The explanation given to me as to why I was not given one of them
was that the training certificates for using the equipment had expired for
the staff.
1. Sans S, Kesteloot H, Kromhout D. The burden of cardiovascular
diseases mortality in Europe. Task Force of the European Society of
Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in Europe.
Eur Heart J
1997;18:1231-48.
AEDs are only as good as the provider.
The article by Descatha and Baer rightly points out the evidence of
providing defibrillators within the workplace and elsewhere, along with
the need for a training programme. The story below emphasizes that this
need is just as great as having the AED in the first place.
I recently found myself in the situation where a cardiac arrest
occurred in front of my eyes in a shopping centre of around 310 stores.
With all the recent literature on the benefit of defibrillators in such a
place I expected there to be one to hand. Sudden cardiac arrest is a
leading cause of death in Europe affecting over 700,000 people each year.1
The chance of successful defibrillation declines at a rate of 7-10% with
each minute of delay.
I was told there was not a single AED in the centre, and
unfortunately despite vigorous basic life support the person died before
the ambulance crew could get him to a defibrillator. After this event I
investigated to find there were in fact 3 defibrillators within the
centre. The explanation given to me as to why I was not given one of them
was that the training certificates for using the equipment had expired for
the staff.
1. Sans S, Kesteloot H, Kromhout D. The burden of cardiovascular
diseases mortality in Europe. Task Force of the European Society of
Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in Europe.
Eur Heart J
1997;18:1231-48.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests