- J Feehally, consultant nephrologist1,
- K E Griffith, general practitioner2,
- E J Lamb, consultant clinical scientist3,
- D J O’Donoghue, national clinical director for kidney care for England45,
- C R V Tomson, consultant nephrologist6
- 1University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE5 4PW
- 2Wenlock Terrace Surgery, York
- 3East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Canterbury
- 4Department of Health, London
- 5Salford Royal Hospitals Foundation Trust, Salford
- 6North Bristol Hospitals NHS Trust, Bristol
- Correspondence to: J Feehally jf27{at}le.ac.uk
- Accepted 6 July 2008
The number of patients receiving long term renal replacement therapy in the United Kingdom is growing inexorably and treatment already consumes more than 2% of the total NHS budget. The cost of managing patients who present late in the course of progressive chronic kidney disease, the evidence that progression can be slowed or halted, and evidence that chronic kidney disease is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease have focused attention on how to optimise the management of early disease in primary care. Policies and guidelines have been designed to improve the recognition, management, and referral of patients with chronic kidney disease by non-specialists. However, the routine laboratory estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the simplified modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation has proved controversial.1 Here we describe the UK policies on identifying and managing chronic kidney disease and address some of the concerns about estimating GFR.
Strategic purpose of estimating GFR
The NHS leads the world in the development of a coherent strategy to improve the quality of care for people with chronic kidney disease. The national service framework for renal services for England was introduced in response to recognition of the growth (and cost) of the treatment of established renal failure.2 3 Renal replacement therapy costs around £30 000 (€37 000; $53 000) a year for each patient, and late referral may cost a further £15 000. The framework adopted a five stage classification of chronic kidney disease based in part on GFR and recommended systematic monitoring of kidney function in at risk populations—those with hypertension, diabetes, vascular disease, urological abnormalities, a family history of kidney disease, or taking drugs that can affect kidney function.
UK consensus guidelines …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012