- Emily Crowe, research fellow1,
- David Halpin, consultant physician & honorary senior clinical lecturer2,
- Paul Stevens, consultant nephrologist3
- on behalf of the Guideline Development Group
- 1National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, Royal College of Physicians, London
- 2Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter
- 3Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury CT1 3NG
- Correspondence to: P Stevens paul.stevens{at}ekht.nhs.uk
Why read this summary?
Chronic kidney disease is associated with substantial comorbidity including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, anaemia, and renal bone disease. People with chronic kidney disease have a far greater likelihood of cardiovascular death than progression to established renal failure (requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation).1 2 3 4 Chronic kidney disease has been highlighted as a public health problem through the international adoption of the US National Kidney Foundation’s Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative staging system and because the prevalence of the disease as defined by the staging system has risen from 10% (in 1988-94) to 13% (in 1999-2004) of the non-institutionalised adult US population.5 6 7 The staging system (which comprises five stages, 1-5) defines chronic kidney disease on the basis of either evidence of kidney damage (proteinuria, haematuria, or anatomical abnormality) or an impaired glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, present on at least two occasions over three months or longer. The use of a threshold of estimated glomerular filtration rate, uncorrected for age or sex, to define disease has been rightly criticised.8 Nevertheless, based on this definition, the age standardised prevalence of stages 3-5 of chronic kidney disease was 8.5% in a representative UK population.9
This article summarises the most recent recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for identifying and managing chronic kidney disease.
Recommendations
NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of the best available evidence. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Development Group’s opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italics in square brackets.
Classification of chronic kidney disease
Because of evidence about differences in risk of adverse outcomes (particularly cardiovascular disease) with declining glomerular filtration rate, stage 3 should be split into two subcategories defined by glomerular filtration rate (table 1 …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012