Exposure to even small doses of arsenic increases the risk of type 2 diabetes
Exposure to high doses of inorganic arsenic, which is mostly ingested through drinking water, is known to increase the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, but few studies have looked at exposure to smaller doses. Arsenobetaine—an organic arsenic compound mainly ingested through seafood—is excreted unchanged in urine and considered non-toxic, but this has not been tested in human studies⇑.
A population based health and nutrition survey (NHANES 2003-4) measured urine concentrations of arsenic compounds in 788 US adults. After adjustment for diabetes risk factors and seafood intake, people with type 2 diabetes had 26% (95% CI 2.0% to 56%) higher concentrations of total urine arsenic than people without diabetes, but concentrations of organic arsenic did not differ in the two groups, which confirms the notion that this type of arsenic is non-toxic in humans. When compared with people with the lowest total urinary arsenic concentrations, people with the highest concentrations had a 3.6-fold higher risk of type 2 diabetes.
The exposure to arsenic seen in the study may have been as little as three times less than the current US Environmental Protection Agency reference dose of 0.3 μg/kg body weight each day, say the editorialists (p 845). The association needs to be explored further in prospective studies, but in the meantime it seems prudent to minimise exposure to arsenic.
Better oxygen systems are feasible and save lives in poor settings
In five hospitals in Papua New Guinea the introduction of new oxygen equipment and a new protocol saved the lives of children with pneumonia. A before and after study compared outcomes in more than 11 000 children with pneumonia who were treated between 2001 and 2007. In 2005, oxygen concentrators and pulse oxymeters were introduced in these hospitals, as well as a protocol for detecting hypoxaemia and using oxygen. This protocol included measuring oxygen saturation in all children admitted …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012