- Geoff Watts, freelance journalist
- 1London
- geoff{at}scileg.freeserve.co.uk
With a clutch of new university departments, a growing number of small biotechnology companies, a dedicated journal and regular outbursts of press hoopla, regenerative medicine is on a roll. From diabetes to Parkinson’s disease, from ailing hearts to failing knees, enthusiasts foresee new remedies for many of the common failures of flesh and bone.
The ambition of regenerative medicine—the reversal of age related, disease induced, and other bodily impairments—is hardly new. Varieties of “live cell therapy” dating back to the 1930s once lured the rich and famous to exclusive Swiss clinics to pay for expensive injections of heaven knows what. Such optimistic, if not foolhardy, leaps in the dark are a world away from current hopes and claims: the product of hard won insights into the biology of stem cells, and the genetic basis of their unique properties. And then there was the recent transplant of a bioengineered bronchus by a Spanish team of surgeons working with a European team of scientists (BMJ 2008;337:a2676, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2676).
Defining regenerative medicine
Precise definitions of this or that branch of medicine are seldom useful and even less often interesting. But an attempt by Chris Mason, a senior lecturer in biochemical engineering, and Pete Dunnill, a professor of biochemical engineering at University College, London to define regenerative medicine1 is illuminating about its roots and its nature. In reaching their own succinct definition (“Regenerative medicine replaces or regenerates human cells, tissues or organs to restore or establish normal function”) they emphasise that the field has grown out of several pre-existing technologies: surgery and surgical implants such as artificial hips; procedures such as bone marrow transplantation; and the use of biomaterials as scaffolds on which cells …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27