In this paper by B Strander and colleagues (BMJ 2007;335:24 Nov, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39363.471806.BE) the authors noticed several inaccuracies in table 2 (the table appears only in the full text version, on bmj.com). The relative risks (95% confidence intervals) for cervical cancer for the period of diagnosis should be 1.27 (1.07 to 1.51) for 1971-80, 1.63 (1.35 to 1.97) for 1981-90, and 1.65 (1.27 to 2.16) for 1991-2002 [not 2000]. The main findings of the study remain as reported.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27