- Richard E Ashcroft, professor of bioethics1,
- Theresa M Marteau, professor of health psychology2,
- Adam Oliver, RCUK senior academic fellow in health economics and policy3
- 1Queen Mary, University of London, School of Law, London E1 4NS
- 2Psychology Department, Health Psychology Section, Guy’s Campus, London SE1 9RT
- 3LSE Health, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE
Cookson and Popay make some important points about the merits and problems of using cash incentives to change health behaviour in disadvantaged populations.1 2
Cookson makes three moral arguments and one prudential argument. Firstly, cash incentives provide an inducement to recipients to change their behaviour to lessen harm to third parties. We could go further and consider direct coercion, for instance, through criminal sanctions. …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27