- Jane Cassidy, freelance journalist
- 1London
- janecassi{at}yahoo.co.uk
Doctors concerned about government attempts to restrict free NHS care for vulnerable migrant groups are gearing up for a fresh battle over treatment charges. The question of fees for foreign nationals is currently being revisited jointly by the Department of Health and the Home Office. A review of their findings is expected shortly and may lead to changes in regulations governing entitlement to free NHS primary care.
The government first consulted on proposals to deny free access to primary care for failed asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in 2004, but it never published the results of its public consultation exercise. But medical students and doctors from the group Medsin have summarised in a report1 the contents of submissions to the 2004 consultation from doctors, primary care trusts, and non-governmental organisations working with migrant communities.They contacted those who responded to the consultation individually to ask for copies of their submissions—after a request in 2007 under the Freedom of Information Act to the Department of Health yielded only the names of 275 respondents. Concerns highlighted in the report include damage to doctor-patient relations, risks to public health, and discrimination.
Medsin member Tom Yates said: “The government proposes dramatic policy changes based on flimsy evidence. The information we’re gathering is valuable to the public debate on this.” The group has now taken its freedom of information appeal to the information commissioner, a government officer who deals with freedom of information challenges.
Others are also lining up to attack restrictions on free primary care. An online petition has been signed by 743 doctors, and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27